Game theory

Rubinstein Bargaining

A non-cooperative alternating-offers model of bargaining with a unique subgame-perfect outcome.

Ask the Game theory assistant1 min read · Updated September 9, 2026

Definition

Two players alternate offers to split a pie of size 11; discount factors δ1,δ2∈(0,1)\delta_1,\delta_2\in(0,1) reflect impatience.

The unique SPE has player 1 offering x1∗=(1−δ2)/(1−δ1δ2)x_1^*=(1-\delta_2)/(1-\delta_1\delta_2) and it being accepted immediately.

Intuition

Impatient players concede faster; first-mover advantage vanishes as frictions disappear.

The ability to delay is an implicit threat that drives the equilibrium split.

Worked example

With δ1=δ2=δ\delta_1=\delta_2=\delta, the proposer gets 1/(1+δ)1/(1+\delta) and the responder δ/(1+δ)\delta/(1+\delta).

As δ→1\delta\to 1, the outcome converges to the symmetric Nash bargaining solution (1/2,1/2)(1/2,1/2).

The math

Proved by stationary backward-induction: equate each player's offer to what they could obtain by waiting one period and proposing themselves.

Provides the "Nash program" microfoundation for the Nash bargaining solution.

Where it is used

Microfoundations for search-matching, wage determination, and bilateral trade.

Extensions incorporate outside options, risk of breakdown, and incomplete information.

More in Game theory

Assembled from the ReLU.chat curated knowledge base. These explanations are concise on purpose; check the sources for anything important.